SPA Peace Rugambwa: The Strategist Redefining Mobilisation in Southwestern Uganda

Peace Rugambwa,Special Presidencial Advisor on Agriculture and Local People/ Courtsey Photo

In southwestern Uganda, a quiet but consequential political shift is underway. It is not announced by convoys or loud processions, nor is it carried by fleeting slogans or one‑day rallies. Instead, it moves deliberately from homestead to homestead, from household to household, restoring an old but powerful political truth: that elections are won not by noise alone, but by presence, persuasion, and personal contact. At the centre of this shift stands Peace Rugambwa.

With the launch of an extensive door‑to‑door mobilisation campaign for President Yoweri Museveni and all NRM party flagbearers in the forthcoming elections, Rugambwa has reintroduced a method of political engagement that many had underestimated, and others had quietly abandoned. In doing so, she has unsettled entrenched political habits and exposed the fragility of influence built on distance rather than connection.

Peace Rugambwa’s approach is not accidental. As Senior Presidential Advisor on Agriculture and Local People, she understands that political loyalty is neither abstract nor automatic. It is grounded in relationships, sustained by trust, and reinforced through tangible engagement. Door‑to‑door mobilisation, in her hands, is not merely a campaign tactic; it is a strategic instrument designed to collapse the distance between leadership and the electorate.

Those attempting to explain away her impact using side arguments, procedural complaints, or manufactured controversies are, in truth, responding to something far more unsettling: the effectiveness of serial, consistent, and personal mobilization. What frightens her critics is not rhetoric, but reach. Not speeches, but structure. Not slogans, but sustained contact with voters in their own spaces.

Rugambwa’s mobilization strategy builds on a foundation she has been laying for years. Through grassroots initiatives such as “the Boona Bageigahare Nyekundire group,” she has cultivated community networks that operate beyond election seasons. These structures have allowed her to understand local dynamics with rare clarity, to identify opinion shapers at the village level, and to speak to communities in a language grounded in lived realities rather than distant promises.

Her recent empowerment of different SACCOs across Kigezi and the wider southwestern region fits seamlessly into this strategy. Economic empowerment, when executed with intention, becomes political stabilisation. By strengthening household economies and community financial institutions, Rugambwa has reinforced a sense of shared stake in continuity, stability, and leadership that prioritises development. The message delivered door to door is therefore not hollow; it is supported by visible interventions people can point to and measure in their daily lives.

What distinguishes Rugambwa’s mobilisation from conventional campaigning is its discipline. Door‑to‑door engagement demands patience, organisation, and resilience. It leaves no room for shortcuts. Each interaction is a moment of accountability, a chance to listen as much as to persuade. This method produces something rallies rarely do: feedback. It generates real‑time intelligence about voter concerns, local grievances, and shifting sentiments. In strategic terms, it allows constant recalibration, ensuring that the campaign remains responsive rather than reactive.

It is precisely this level of control and foresight that has caused unease among political actors accustomed to looser, less grounded forms of mobilization. For years, influence in some quarters has relied on intermediaries, assumptions, and inherited loyalties. Rugambwa’s approach challenges that comfort. By going directly to the people, she bypasses gatekeepers and exposes the difference between assumed support and earned support.

Her mobilization is unapologetically focused. It is directed toward securing victory for President Museveni and all NRM flagbearers in southwestern Uganda. It does not pretend to be anything else. Yet it is precisely this clarity of purpose that gives it strength. There is no confusion about intent, no dilution of message. The campaign is built around continuity, development, and consolidation of political gains already embedded in the region.

Resistance to Rugambwa’s work has followed a familiar pattern. Rather than confront the strategy head‑on, critics attempt to reframe it, distract from it, or delegitimize it through peripheral arguments. But these responses only underline the effectiveness of what she is doing. Political actors rarely panic in the face of failure; they panic when they recognise momentum they cannot easily counter.

Rugambwa’s resilience in the face of such resistance reveals another layer of her strategic depth. She does not retreat when challenged; she intensifies engagement. She does not personalize opposition; she absorbs it into the broader objective. This is the hallmark of a seasoned strategist, one who understands that sustained mobilization, not momentary confrontation, decides outcomes.

Beyond the immediate election, her approach carries broader implications for political organization in the region. It signals a return to politics as daily work rather than episodic spectacle. It reminds parties and candidates alike that legitimacy is renewed continuously through contact, service, and explanation. In this sense, Rugambwa is not merely campaigning; she is reshaping expectations about how political loyalty is built and maintained.

As the election approaches, one fact is increasingly difficult to ignore. The door‑to‑door mobilization unfolding across southwestern Uganda has altered the political terrain. It has energized supporters, unsettled opponents, and reasserted the centrality of grassroots engagement in determining electoral outcomes. Those dismissing it do so at their own peril.

Peace Rugambwa’s work demonstrates that political strategy, when grounded in community, discipline, and clarity of purpose, becomes formidable. Her serial touch of mobilization is not feared because it is loud, but because it is consistent. Not because it is dramatic, but because it is effective. In anchoring her campaign around people rather than platforms, she has reminded the region, and the nation, that elections are ultimately decided one door, one conversation, and one conviction at a time.

-ENDS-